Central Bank credibility and fiscal responsibility Jesse Schreger, Pierre Yared and Emilio Zaratiegui
By: Schreger, Jesse
.
Contributor(s): Yared, Pierre
| Zaratiegui, Emilio
.
Material type:
ArticleSubject(s): BANCOS CENTRALES| Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 2145/2024/3-2 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 2145/2024/3-2 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| OP 2145/2024/2-1 Disentangling rent index differences | OP 2145/2024/3 The American Economic Review | OP 2145/2024/3-1 Regulating transformative technologies | OP 2145/2024/3-2 Central Bank credibility and fiscal responsibility | OP 2145/2024/3-3 Dynamic spending responses to wealth shocks | OP 2145/2024/4 The American Economic Review | OP 2145/2024/4-1 The AI dilemma |
Bibliografía.
We consider a New Keynesian model with strategic monetary and fiscal interactions. The fiscal authority maximizes social welfare. Monetary policy is delegated to a central bank with an anti-inflation bias that suffers from a lack of commitment. The impact of central bank hawkishness on debt issuance is nonmonotonic because increased hawkishness reduces the benefit from fiscal stimulus while simultaneously increasing real debt capacity. Starting from high levels of hawkishness (dovishness), a marginal increase in the central bank's anti-inflation bias decreases (increases) debt issuance.
There are no comments for this item.