Distribution of Schedule M-1 corporate book - tax difference data 1990 -2003 for three large - size and three industry groups by Charles Boynton, Portia DeFilippes and Ellen Legel
By: Boynton, Charles
.
Contributor(s): DeFilippes, Portia | Legel, Ellen.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: 2006Subject(s): IMPUESTOS | REFORMA | ESTADOS UNIDOS | LEGISLACION | COMENTARIOS | DECLARACIONES TRIBUTARIAS | SOCIEDADES
In:
Tax notes v. 111, n. 2, April 10, 2006, p. 177-211
| Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IEF | OP 1820/2006/111/2-1 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 1820/2006/111/2-1 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| OP 1820/2006/111/1-2 Canada - U.S. domestic reverse hybrid financing structures | OP 1820/2006/111/12 Passive activity losses of trusts and estates | OP 1820/2006/111/13 Goldman sachs ruling on variable strips | OP 1820/2006/111/2-1 Distribution of Schedule M-1 corporate book - tax difference data 1990 -2003 for three large - size and three industry groups | OP 1820/2006/111/2-2 The law of unintended consequences | OP 1820/2006/111/3-1 Black & Decker in the fourth circuit | OP 1820/2006/111/3-2 The COLI cases through the looking glass of the sham transaction doctrine |
Resumen. Conclusión.
There are no comments for this item.