Can fiscal transparency mitigate political budget cycles? Hyewon Kang
By: Kang, Hyewon
.
Material type: 





Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 1443/2025/1/2-2 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 1443/2025/1/2-2 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 1443/2024/3/4-4 Chinese aid and democratic values in Latin America | OP 1443/2025/1/2 Public Choice | OP 1443/2025/1/2-1 Soft budget constraints and technological innovations | OP 1443/2025/1/2-2 Can fiscal transparency mitigate political budget cycles? | OP 1444 Netherlands International Law Review: International Law, Conflict of Laws, Comparative Law | OP 1444/1983/1 Hugo Grotius | OP 1444/1983/3 The Constitution of the Kingdom of the Netherlands |
Bibliografía
This study investigates the impact of fiscal transparency on the political budget cycle (PBC) using U.S. State government data from 1991 to 2018. Employing a dynamic panel model, we test whether fiscal transparency mitigates PBC and influences expenditure composition in election years. A fiscal transparency index is constructed, encompassing the comprehensiveness of budget documents, legislature oversight, and the public availability of online financial information. Results indicate that fiscal transparency mitigates the PBC effects on total expenditure. Additionally, our results suggest a shift in expenditure composition from welfare to health and police spending during election years, supporting the PBC models’ hypothesis that incumbents prioritize visible spending. This study contributes to the conditional PBC literature by shedding light on the role of fiscal transparency.
There are no comments for this item.