Homestead exemptions, heterogeneous assessment, and property tax progressivity Keith Ihlanfeldt and Luke P. Rodgers
By: Ihlanfeldt, Keith R
.
Contributor(s): Rodgers, Luke P
.
Material type: 







Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 233/2022/1-1 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 233/2022/1-1 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 233/2021/4-4 Childcare infrastructure in the Nordic Countries as a way of enabling female labor market participation | OP 233/2021/4-5 Public finance and racism | OP 233/2022/1 National Tax Journal | OP 233/2022/1-1 Homestead exemptions, heterogeneous assessment, and property tax progressivity | OP 233/2022/1-2 Property tax compliance and reverse mortgages | OP 233/2022/1-3 Taxing the digital economy | OP 233/2022/1-4 Forum |
Resumen
Bibliografía.
Homestead exemption policies are ostensibly intended to reduce the property tax burden of lower-income homeowners. Because assessment rates tend be lower for higher-priced homes, the opposing effects of exemptions and regressive assessments can result in either a regressive or progressive property tax. Using 2018 data on all single-family homes in Florida, we find that in the majority of counties, the homestead exemption dominates regressive assessment, resulting in a progressive tax. We also explore how progressivity would be affected by modifying current features of the property tax, including the homestead exemption take-up rate, the cap on valuation growth, and regressive assessments.
There are no comments for this item.