The DAC7 proposal and reporting obligation for online platforms S.A. Stevens & J.T. van Wamelen
By: Stevens, S. A
.
Contributor(s): Wamelen, J. T. van
.
Material type: 






Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 2141-B/2021/1-3 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 2141-B/2021/1-3 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 2141-B/2021/1 EC Tax Review | OP 2141-B/2021/1-1 "Tax Haven" conditions included in COVID-19 state aid schemes | OP 2141-B/2021/1-2 DAC6 and the challenges arising from Its disclosure obligation | OP 2141-B/2021/1-3 The DAC7 proposal and reporting obligation for online platforms | OP 2141-B/2021/1-4 The new rules for reporting by sharing and gig economy platforms under the OECD and EU Initiatives | OP 2141-B/2021/1-5 Is there a special enforced tax collection regime under the ECtHR case law ? | OP 2141-B/2021/2 EC Tax Review |
Disponible también en formato electrónico.
Resumen.
On 15 July 2020, the EU Commission published a proposal for a directive amending, for the sixth time, Directive 2011/16/EU on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation. The DAC7 Proposal extends EU tax transparency rules to digital platforms. It is proposed that EU Member States will automatically exchange information on income generated by sellers on digital platforms. The authors discuss the content of the DAC7 proposal and try to assess whether it is necessary and proportionate. With respect to proportionality, the authors look in particular at the administrative costs and privacy aspects of the proposal but also consider the consequences for a level playing field for companies. Throughout the article, the authors examine whether the proposal is sufficiently clear.
There are no comments for this item.