What's fair? preferences for tax progressivity in the wake of the financial crisis Julian Limberg
By: Limberg, Julian
.
Material type: 




Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 1793/2020/2-1 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 1793/2020/2-1 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 1793/2020/1-1 More bang for your buck | OP 1793/2020/1-2 The political economy of budget trade-offs | OP 1793/2020/2 Journal of Public Policy | OP 1793/2020/2-1 What's fair? | OP 1793/2020/3 Journal of Public Policy | OP 1793/2020/4 Journal of Public Policy | OP 1793/2021/1 Journal of Public Policy |
Bibliografía
Progressive taxation is an effective redistributive tool in times of growing inequality. However, like all public policies, an increase in tax progressivity is unlikely if it lacks popular demand. Has the financial crisis affected the demand for progressive taxation? Building on research that has identified fairness beliefs as the main factor pushing for taxes on the rich, I argue that the Great Recession and states' reactions to it have caused a general shift in tax policy preferences. As a consequence, demand for tax progressivity is higher in crisis countries. Multilevel analyses using survey data for 32 countries show support for my argument. These findings have important implications for our understanding of the politics of redistribution in the 21 st century.
There are no comments for this item.