Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Does the cost - cutting strategy of closing public schools provide financial benefits? evidence from Ohio Phuong Nguyen - Hoang

By: Nguyen Hoang, Phuong.
Material type: ArticleArticlePublisher: 2019Subject(s): CENTROS DOCENTES | GASTOS EN EDUCACION | HACIENDAS LOCALES | ESTADOS UNIDOS In: Public Budgeting and Finance v. 39, n. 3, Fall 2019, p. 3-21 Summary: From 1995 through 2014, 15 percent of school districts nationwide closed at least one school without opening any new school. Although budgetary constraints have been claimed as a major reason to close a public school, no empirical study has examined the financial benefits of school closures. This study finds that Ohio school closures reduce an average district's total operating expenditures by $278–$285 per pupil, and that savings come primarily from cuts in classroom instructional services, including teachers. This study provides empirical evidence on the financial implications of school closings needed for stakeholders involved in a school closing process.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Resumen.

From 1995 through 2014, 15 percent of school districts nationwide closed at least one school without opening any new school. Although budgetary constraints have been claimed as a major reason to close a public school, no empirical study has examined the financial benefits of school closures. This study finds that Ohio school closures reduce an average district's total operating expenditures by $278–$285 per pupil, and that savings come primarily from cuts in classroom instructional services, including teachers. This study provides empirical evidence on the financial implications of school closings needed for stakeholders involved in a school closing process.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Powered by Koha