Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Arbitration institutes an issue overlooked Hans Mooij

By: Mooij, Hans.
Material type: ArticleArticlePublisher: 2019Subject(s): DERECHO TRIBUTARIO | FISCALIDAD INTERNACIONAL | ARBITRAJE | RESOLUCIONES EXTRAJUDICIALES DE CONFLICTOS | TRATADOS INTERNACIONALES | CONVENIO MULTILATERAL | UNION EUROPEA In: Intertax v. 47, n. 8/9, August / September 2019, p.737-744Summary: The article argues that with the MLI and the Dispute Resolution Directive, numbers of arbitrations may reasonably be expected to go up. According to the author the tax authorities will have to face the question whether they want to administer arbitrations themselves, or prefer to instead call on facilitation by professional arbitration institutes as is customary practice in commercial or investment arbitration. Proper and effective administration will be a significant factor to the eventual success of tax treaty arbitration. Absent any guidance in either the MLI or the Dispute Resolution Directive, the issue requires careful consideration from authorities.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Resumen.

The article argues that with the MLI and the Dispute Resolution Directive, numbers of arbitrations may reasonably be expected to go up. According to the author the tax authorities will have to face the question whether they want to administer arbitrations themselves, or prefer to instead call on facilitation by professional arbitration institutes as is customary practice in commercial or investment arbitration. Proper and effective administration will be a significant factor to the eventual success of tax treaty arbitration. Absent any guidance in either the MLI or the Dispute Resolution Directive, the issue requires careful consideration from authorities.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Powered by Koha