Arbitration institutes an issue overlooked Hans Mooij
By: Mooij, Hans
.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: 2019Subject(s): DERECHO TRIBUTARIO | FISCALIDAD INTERNACIONAL | ARBITRAJE | RESOLUCIONES EXTRAJUDICIALES DE CONFLICTOS | TRATADOS INTERNACIONALES | CONVENIO MULTILATERAL | UNION EUROPEA
In:
Intertax v. 47, n. 8/9, August / September 2019, p.737-744Summary: The article argues that with the MLI and the Dispute Resolution Directive, numbers of arbitrations may reasonably be expected to go up. According to the author the tax authorities will have to face the question whether they want to administer arbitrations themselves, or prefer to instead call on facilitation by professional arbitration institutes as is customary practice in commercial or investment arbitration. Proper and effective administration will be a significant factor to the eventual success of tax treaty arbitration. Absent any guidance in either the MLI or the Dispute Resolution Directive, the issue requires careful consideration from authorities.
| Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 2141/2019/8/9-8 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 2141/2019/8/9-8 |
Resumen.
The article argues that with the MLI and the Dispute Resolution Directive, numbers of arbitrations may reasonably be expected to go up. According to the author the tax authorities will have to face the question whether they want to administer arbitrations themselves, or prefer to instead call on facilitation by professional arbitration institutes as is customary practice in commercial or investment arbitration. Proper and effective administration will be a significant factor to the eventual success of tax treaty arbitration. Absent any guidance in either the MLI or the Dispute Resolution Directive, the issue requires careful consideration from authorities.
Click on an image to view it in the image viewer
There are no comments for this item.