Budgeting for mandatory spending prologue to reform Marvin Phaup
By: Phaup, Marvin
.
Material type: 




Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | URL | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 1716/2019/1-1 (Browse shelf) | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/pbaf.12210 | Available | OP 1716/2019/1-1 |
Disponible también en formato electrónico en la Biblioteca del IEF.
Resumen.
Bibliografía.
This paper identifies a feature of the federal budget process that, consistent with the findings of behavioral research, increases the difficulty for policymakers of restraining the growth of mandatory spending to sustainable rates: budgetary accounting. Specifically, use of cash-basis accounting, on-budget payment accounts, and a narrow definition of debt defers recognition of the cost of mandatory spending until benefits are payable and politically unavoidable. Acting to control “future” costs is cognitively more difficult for decision-makers than addressing cost now as obligated. The paper proposes a trial of alternative budgetary accounting for mandatory spending that saliently recognizes cost as it accrues.
There are no comments for this item.