German anti-abuse legislation and EU law incompatible after all Oliver R. Hoor and Andreas Medler
By: Hoor, Oliver R
.
Contributor(s): Medler, Andreas
.
Material type:
ArticlePublisher: 2018Subject(s): EROSIÓN DE LA BASE IMPONIBLE Y TRASLADO DE BENEFICIOS| Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 804/2018/2-1 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 804/2018/2-1 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| OP 804/2018/1-4 Luxembourg | OP 804/2018/1-5 Tax anti-avoidance rules in Latin America | OP 804/2018/2 Tax Planning International Review | OP 804/2018/2-1 German anti-abuse legislation and EU law | OP 804/2018/2-10 Brazil | OP 804/2018/2-2 The U.K. tax treatment of initial coin offerings | OP 804/2018/2-3 Get ready for customs changes post-Brexit |
Disponible también en formato electrónico a través de la Biblioteca del IEF.
Resumen.
The CJEU's decision in two recent landmark cases involving German anti-abuse legislation has confirmed that taxpayers are free to rely on their EU freedoms when structuring investments as long as the underlying contractual arrangements are not 'wholly artificial arrangements'.
There are no comments for this item.