German anti-abuse legislation and EU law incompatible after all Oliver R. Hoor and Andreas Medler
By: Hoor, Oliver R
.
Contributor(s): Medler, Andreas.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: 2018Subject(s): EROSIÓN DE LA BASE IMPONIBLE Y TRASLADO DE BENEFICIOS | EVASION FISCAL | PREVENCIÓN | ALEMANIA | INCUMPLIMIENTO DEL DERECHO COMUNITARIO | TRIBUNAL DE JUSTICIA DE LAS COMUNIDADES EUROPEAS | UNION EUROPEA | JURISPRUDENCIA | ELUSION FISCAL
In:
Tax Planning International Review v. 45, n. 2, February 2018, p. 4-8Summary: The CJEU's decision in two recent landmark cases involving German anti-abuse legislation has confirmed that taxpayers are free to rely on their EU freedoms when structuring investments as long as the underlying contractual arrangements are not 'wholly artificial arrangements'.
| Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 804/2018/2-1 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 804/2018/2-1 |
Disponible también en formato electrónico a través de la Biblioteca del IEF.
Resumen.
The CJEU's decision in two recent landmark cases involving German anti-abuse legislation has confirmed that taxpayers are free to rely on their EU freedoms when structuring investments as long as the underlying contractual arrangements are not 'wholly artificial arrangements'.
Click on an image to view it in the image viewer
There are no comments for this item.