Self-imposition of public oversight Mark Gradstein
By: Gradstein, Mark
.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: 2018Subject(s): AUTOLIQUIDACIONES | IMPUESTOS | ESTADOS UNIDOSOnline resources: Click here to access online
In:
Public Choice v. 175, n. 1-2, April 2018, p. 95-109Summary: We argue that policymakers may have personal interests in policy restraints channeled through public oversight. Self-imposition of public oversight can be beneficial for the policymaker because it may help alleviate the dynamic inconsistency problem that she otherwise faces. In the setting studied herein, self-imposed public oversight takes the
form of a ceiling on tax rates, which can be overridden only with the legislature’s consent. Such a mechanism is shown to credibly commit the policymaker to future tax restraint, thus inducing larger productive effort.
| Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 1443/2018/175/1/2-1 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 1443/2018/175/1/2-1 |
Disponible en formato electrónico a través de la Biblioteca del IEF.
Resumen.
Bibliografía.
We argue that policymakers may have personal interests in policy restraints channeled through public oversight. Self-imposition of public oversight can be beneficial for the policymaker because it may help alleviate the dynamic inconsistency problem that she otherwise faces. In the setting studied herein, self-imposed public oversight takes the
form of a ceiling on tax rates, which can be overridden only with the legislature’s consent. Such a mechanism is shown to credibly commit the policymaker to future tax restraint, thus inducing larger productive effort.
There are no comments for this item.