Normal view MARC view ISBD view

On estimating the fiscal benefits of early intervention Leon Feinstein, Haron Chowdry and Kirsten Asmussen

By: Feinstein, Leon.
Material type: ArticleArticlePublisher: 2017Subject(s): NIÑOS | ASISTENCIA SOCIAL | GASTOS FISCALES | REINO UNIDO | MODELOS ECONOMETRICOS In: National Institute Economic Review n. 240, May 2017, p. R15-R29Summary: In this paper we explain some of the difficulties of providing forecasts of the financial benefits of early interventionprogrammes, focussing onthose delivered during the early childhood period. We highlight the diversity of early intervention,and the complexity and multiplicity of outcomes. We summarise recent work at the Early Intervention Foundation to assess the evidence on the impacts of early intervention, recognising the diversity of approaches to delivery and the importanceof innovation and local practice as well as of rigorousapproaches to evaluating causal effects. We also describe new ways of assessingaccurately the local fiscal costs of late intervention and consider the implications of this for addressing the well-established barriers to investment in prevention. Our analysis brings to the fore gaps in the evidence from which even themost rigorous .gold-standard. research is not immune. These limitations preventthe production of an accurate and realistic cost-benefit ratio or net present value for the majority of programmes as delivered in practice. We suggest some paths towards a firmer foundation of evidence and a better alignment of evidence and policy.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Disponible también en línea a través de la Biblioteca del Instituto de Estudios Fiscales. Resumen. Bibliografía.

In this paper we explain some of the difficulties of providing forecasts of the financial benefits of early interventionprogrammes, focussing onthose delivered during the early childhood period. We highlight the diversity of early intervention,and the complexity and multiplicity of outcomes. We summarise recent work at the Early Intervention Foundation to assess the evidence on the impacts of early intervention, recognising the diversity of approaches to delivery and the importanceof innovation and local practice as well as of rigorousapproaches to evaluating causal effects. We also describe new ways of assessingaccurately the local fiscal costs of late intervention and consider the implications of this for addressing the well-established barriers to investment in prevention. Our analysis brings to the fore gaps in the evidence from which even themost rigorous .gold-standard. research is not immune. These limitations preventthe production of an accurate and realistic cost-benefit ratio or net present value for the majority of programmes as delivered in practice. We suggest some paths towards a firmer foundation of evidence and a better alignment of evidence and policy.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Powered by Koha