Un - taxed profit between head office and parmanent establishment does not constitute a criminal tax offence a German example Ulf Andresen & Hanno Kiesel
By: Andresen, Ulf
.
Contributor(s): Kiesel, Hanno.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: 2013Subject(s): ESTABLECIMIENTO PERMANENTE | PERDIDAS | PLUSVALIAS | IMPUESTOS | ALEMANIA
In:
Intertax v. 41, n. 6/7, June/July 2013, p. 387-391
| Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IEF | OP 2141/2013/6/7-5 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 2141/2013/6/7-5 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| OP 2141/2013/6/7-2 National tax law | OP 2141/2013/6/7-3 The lawfulness of the restriction of losses | OP 2141/2013/6/7-4 Tracing the origins of the Netherlands' tax treaty network | OP 2141/2013/6/7-5 Un - taxed profit between head office and parmanent establishment does not constitute a criminal tax offence | OP 2141/2013/6/7-6 Operating base and taxation for foreign airline companies operating in Italy | OP 2141/2013/6/7-7 Limitation on benefits articles in income tax treaties | OP 2141/2013/8/9-1 The concept of associated enterprises |
Accesible también en línea a través de la Biblioteca del Insituto de Estudios Fiscales. Conclusión. Resumen.
There are no comments for this item.