Supreme Court should clarify its deference standard by Irving Salem
By: Salem, Irving
.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: 2006Subject(s): IMPUESTOS | TRIBUNALES DE JUSTICIA | JURISDICCION CONTENCIOSO-ADMINISTRATIVA | JURISPRUDENCIA | ESTADOS UNIDOS | COMENTARIOS | SOCIEDADES
In:
Tax notes v. 112, n. 12, September 18, 2006, p. 1063-1069
| Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IEF | OP 1820/2006/112/12 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 1820/2006/112/12 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| OP 1820/2006/112/1 Tax base modifications | OP 1820/2006/112/10 " Substantial business activity " under the anti - inversion regs | OP 1820/2006/112/11 FLP fix must be part of transfer tax reform | OP 1820/2006/112/12 Supreme Court should clarify its deference standard | OP 1820/2006/112/13-1 Selective waiver and the tax practitioner privilege | OP 1820/2006/112/13-2 IRS says U.K. tax not compulsory but taxpayers need not agree | OP 1820/2006/112/2-1 Hubert Enterprises |
Resumen. Conclusión.
There are no comments for this item.