The law of unintended consequences new generation of trust preferreds squeezes market for DRD preferreds by Mark H. Leeds
By: Leeds, Mark H
.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: 2006Subject(s): VALORES MOBILIARIOS | RENDIMIENTOS DE CAPITAL | IMPUESTOS | ESTADOS UNIDOS | LEGISLACION | COMENTARIOS
In:
Tax notes v. 111, n. 2, April 10, 2006, p. 213-221
| Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IEF | OP 1820/2006/111/2-2 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 1820/2006/111/2-2 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| OP 1820/2006/111/12 Passive activity losses of trusts and estates | OP 1820/2006/111/13 Goldman sachs ruling on variable strips | OP 1820/2006/111/2-1 Distribution of Schedule M-1 corporate book - tax difference data 1990 -2003 for three large - size and three industry groups | OP 1820/2006/111/2-2 The law of unintended consequences | OP 1820/2006/111/3-1 Black & Decker in the fourth circuit | OP 1820/2006/111/3-2 The COLI cases through the looking glass of the sham transaction doctrine | OP 1820/2006/111/4-1 Limitation on itemized deductions for trusts |
Resumen. Conclusión.
There are no comments for this item.