Kimbell v. United States the rise and apparent fall of the section 2036 argument against FLPs by Brant J. Hellwig
By: Hellwig, Brant J
.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: 2004Subject(s): IMPUESTOS | RENTA | EMPRESAS FAMILIARES | ESTADOS UNIDOS | JURISPRUDENCIA | COMENTARIOS
In:
Tax notes v. 104, n. 5, August 2, 2004, p. 517-534
| Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IEF | OP 1820/2004/104/5-1 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 1820/2004/104/5-1 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| OP 1820/2004/104/3-2 Voip | OP 1820/2004/104/4-1 Consolidation anomalies in form 1120 corporate tax return data | OP 1820/2004/104/4-2 The section 355 edifice | OP 1820/2004/104/5-1 Kimbell v. United States | OP 1820/2004/104/5-2 From Rochdale principles to LLCs | OP 1820/2004/104/6-1 Interim administrative resolution of loss desallowance issues | OP 1820/2004/104/6-2 Cross - border acquisitions, divestitures and restructurings of U. S. multinationals |
Resumen. Conclusión.
There are no comments for this item.