Putting Government spending shocks under the microscope standard vector autoregression versus the narrative approach Rong Li
By: Li, Rong
.
Material type: 




Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEF | OP 207/2017/3-1 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 207/2017/3-1 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
Disponible también en línea a través de la Biblioteca del Instituto de Estudios Fiscales. Resumen. Conclusión. Bibliografía.
Standard vector autoregression and the narrative approach yield contrasting responses ofconsumption and real wages to a government spending shock. A key difference in the approaches is the composition of identified shocks. Standard VAR features a large increasein government purchase of intermediate goods and services and investment, but a small response of government employment compensation. By contrast, the narrative approach identifies a smaller increase in intermediate goods and services purchase but a large increase in employment compensation. Furthermore, empirical evidence indicates impacts of fiscal stimulusvary considerably for different types of spending from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.
There are no comments for this item.