Resolving Australian tax controversies does the tax jurisprudence under the European Convention on Human Rights suggest a better way ? Justin Dabner
By: Dabner, Justin
.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: 2016Subject(s): CONTRIBUYENTES | DERECHOS | DERECHOS HUMANOS | UNION EUROPEA | AUSTRALIA
In:
Australian Tax Forum : a Journal of Taxation Policy, Law and Reform v. 31, n. 2, 2016, p. 213-256
| Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IEF | OP 1867/2016/2-1 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 1867/2016/2-1 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| OP 1867/2016/1-4 Developing countries and the automatic exchange of information standard | OP 1867/2016/1-5 Fiscal responses to climate change in Australia | OP 1867/2016/1-6 An empirical analysis of the tax burden of mining firms versus non - mining firms in Australia | OP 1867/2016/2-1 Resolving Australian tax controversies | OP 1867/2016/2-2 Finally, a goods and services tax for Malaysia | OP 1867/2016/2-3 Tax compliance and cultural values | OP 1867/2016/2-4 Tax literacy in Australia |
Disponible también en línea a través de la Biblioteca del Instituto de Estudios Fiscales. Resumen. Conclusión.
There are no comments for this item.