CFC rules and Anti - Tax Avoidance Directive Jens Schönfeld Bonn
By: Schönfeld, Jens
.
Material type: 








Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEF | OP 2141-B/2017/3-5 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 2141-B/2017/3-5 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 2141-B/2017/3-2 The interest limitation rule in the Anti - Tax Avoidance Directive ( ATAD ) and the net taxation principle | OP 2141-B/2017/3-3 Exit taxation | OP 2141-B/2017/3-4 The General Anti - Abuse Rule of the Anti - Tax Avoidance Directive | OP 2141-B/2017/3-5 CFC rules and Anti - Tax Avoidance Directive | OP 2141-B/2017/3-6 Hybrid mismatches under the ATAD I and II | OP 2141-B/2017/3-7 Taking EU fundamental freedoms seriously | OP 2141-B/2017/4-1 Towards a more coordinated approach of the relation between the taxpayerand tax administrations |
Disponible también en línea a través de la Biblioteca del Instituto de Estudios Fiscales. Resumen. Conclusión.
The effects of the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (ATAD) on Controlled Foreign Company (CFC) rules have been instructively discussed in depth, especially in the German scholarly literature. The following contribution re-examinesa few aspects against the background of a hypothetical case and addresses various issues, including the question as to whether the Directive does not also givetaxpayers a certain minimum level of protection and at the same time impose general limits on national legislatures.
There are no comments for this item.