Because not there, neither here? examining the " mirror legislation "status of the U.K.'s new anti - hybrid rules by Douglas Holland
By: Holland, Douglas
.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: 2017Subject(s): INSTRUMENTOS HÍBRIDOS FINANCIEROS | IMPUESTOS | EROSIÓN DE LA BASE IMPONIBLE Y TRASLADO DE BENEFICIOS | PREVENCIÓN | REINO UNIDO | ELUSION FISCAL
In:
Tax Notes International v. 87, n. 6, August 7, 2017, p. 613-625
| Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IEF | OP 138-bis/2017/87/6-5 (Browse shelf) | Available |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| OP 138-bis/2017/87/6-2 Clearer CRS guidance needed for U.S. benefit plans | OP 138-bis/2017/87/6-3 Cross - border health insurance and pension contributions deductible in Germany, says CJEU | OP 138-bis/2017/87/6-4 Taxation on the Blockchain | OP 138-bis/2017/87/6-5 Because not there, neither here? | OP 138-bis/2017/87/7-1 The CJEU's Berlioz judgment | OP 138-bis/2017/87/7-2 Is the cost - sharing group for VAT destined to become a historical artifact for financial institutions ? | OP 138-bis/2017/87/8-1 Taxpayers' rights |
Disponible en línea a través de la Biblioteca del Instituto de Estudios Fiscales. Conclusión.
There are no comments for this item.