Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Building the gateway electrónico why the two pillars need each other Reuven Avi-Yonah, Ajitesh Kir

By: Avi Yonah, Reuven Shlomo.
Contributor(s): Kir, Ajitesh.
Material type: ArticleArticleSubject(s): PRIMER PILAR (OCDE) | SEGUNDO PILAR (OCDE) | UTPR (OCDE) | CONVENIO MULTILATERAL In: Intertax v.52, n.10, oct 2024, p. 591 – 601Summary: There is a reason the OECD proposed two pillars for its gateway to a better tax future. A gateway requires both pillars, and neither can stand without the other. Pillar 2 is a fait accompli, but it needs countries to implement Pillar 1 as well because in the absence of a clear sourcing rule there is no limit to countries implementing the Qualified Domestic Minimum Top-Up Tax (QDMTT), which would turn off the other parts of Pillar 2 and potentially result in double taxation. Pillar 1 is not going forward in the absence of a Multilateral Tax Convention (MLC), but it can be implemented unilaterally, although that would require overriding existing tax treaties.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

There is a reason the OECD proposed two pillars for its gateway to a better tax future. A gateway requires both pillars, and neither can stand without the other. Pillar 2 is a fait accompli, but it needs countries to implement Pillar 1 as well because in the absence of a clear sourcing rule there is no limit to countries implementing the Qualified Domestic Minimum Top-Up Tax (QDMTT), which would turn off the other parts of Pillar 2 and potentially result in double taxation. Pillar 1 is not going forward in the absence of a Multilateral Tax Convention (MLC), but it can be implemented unilaterally, although that would require overriding existing tax treaties.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Powered by Koha