Building the gateway electrónico why the two pillars need each other Reuven Avi-Yonah, Ajitesh Kir
By: Avi Yonah, Reuven Shlomo
.
Contributor(s): Kir, Ajitesh
.
Material type: 




Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 2141/2024/10-1 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 2141/2024/10-1 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 2141/2023/8/9-6 Challenges in applying Saudi Arabian tax treaties | OP 2141/2024/1 Intertax | OP 2141/2024/10 Intertax | OP 2141/2024/10-1 Building the gateway | OP 2141/2024/10-2 The Pillar 2 Directive and the qualified domestic (minimum) top-up tax puzzle | OP 2141/2024/10-3 Inter-nation equity and the regulation of tax competition via the global minimum tax rule | OP 2141/2024/10-4 Five years of digital services taxes in Europe |
There is a reason the OECD proposed two pillars for its gateway to a better tax future. A gateway requires both pillars, and neither can stand without the other. Pillar 2 is a fait accompli, but it needs countries to implement Pillar 1 as well because in the absence of a clear sourcing rule there is no limit to countries implementing the Qualified Domestic Minimum Top-Up Tax (QDMTT), which would turn off the other parts of Pillar 2 and potentially result in double taxation. Pillar 1 is not going forward in the absence of a Multilateral Tax Convention (MLC), but it can be implemented unilaterally, although that would require overriding existing tax treaties.
There are no comments for this item.