Noncompete agreements and the welfare of consumers by Michael Lipsitz and Mark J. Tremblay
By: Lipsitz, Michael
.
Contributor(s): Tremblay, Mark J.
Material type: 
ArticleSubject(s): ACUERDOS COMERCIALES | MONOPOLIOS | OLIGOPOLIOS | EMPRENDEDORES | CONSUMIDORES
In:
American Economic Journal : Microeconomics v. 16, n. 4, November 2024, p. 112-153.Summary: Employee spin-offs harm incumbent firms by increasing competition (benefiting consumers) and preventing firm owners from making beneficial investments in workers who may later spin off (harming consumers). We model noncompete agreements (NCAs) as solutions for the firm and analyze the resulting trade-off for consumers. We show that market structure and the nature of investment play large roles. Counterintuitively, increased investment benefits have the potential to harm consumers such that industries where firms value NCAs the most are those where harm is greater. Finally, we draw two analogies between NCAs and antitrust and show how those areas inform NCA policy.
| Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 2136/2024/4-2 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 2136/2024/4-2 |
Bibliografía
Employee spin-offs harm incumbent firms by increasing competition (benefiting consumers) and preventing firm owners from making beneficial investments in workers who may later spin off (harming consumers). We model noncompete agreements (NCAs) as solutions for the firm and analyze the resulting trade-off for consumers. We show that market structure and the nature of investment play large roles. Counterintuitively, increased investment benefits have the potential to harm consumers such that industries where firms value NCAs the most are those where harm is greater. Finally, we draw two analogies between NCAs and antitrust and show how those areas inform NCA policy.
There are no comments for this item.