Using list prices to collude or to compete? Diego Cussen and Juan-Pablo Montero
By: Cussen, Diego
.
Contributor(s): Montero, Juan-Pablo
.
Material type: 




Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 282/2024/664-1 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 282/2024/664-1 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 282/2024/663-1 Price-cost margins, fixed costs and excess profits | OP 282/2024/663-2 Energy tax exemptions and industrial production | OP 282/2024/664 The Economic Journal | OP 282/2024/664-1 Using list prices to collude or to compete? | OP 282/2025/665 The Economic Journal | OP 282/2025/665-1 Optimal taxation of capital income with heterogeneous rates of return | OP 282/2025/667 The Economic Journal |
Bibliografía
Collusion is deemed unlikely in wholesale markets where upstream suppliers and intermediate buyers privately negotiate discounts off list prices and sales quotas are unfeasible. However, many wholesale markets include both small and large buyers who compete in the retail market. We study the role of publicly announced list prices in this wholesale-retail setting, whether suppliers collude or compete. When suppliers collude, public announcements of list prices extend the possibility of collusion from small to large buyers (the multi-buyer contact effect). When suppliers compete, these announcements provide them with commitment to negotiate better terms with large buyers (the commitment effect).
There are no comments for this item.