Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Using list prices to collude or to compete? Diego Cussen and Juan-Pablo Montero

By: Cussen, Diego.
Contributor(s): Montero, Juan-Pablo.
Material type: ArticleArticleSubject(s): ACUERDOS COMERCIALES | OLIGOPOLIOS | MONOPOLIOS | COMPETENCIA DESLEAL In: The Economic Journal v. 134, n. 664, November 2024, p. 3232-3261.Summary: Collusion is deemed unlikely in wholesale markets where upstream suppliers and intermediate buyers privately negotiate discounts off list prices and sales quotas are unfeasible. However, many wholesale markets include both small and large buyers who compete in the retail market. We study the role of publicly announced list prices in this wholesale-retail setting, whether suppliers collude or compete. When suppliers collude, public announcements of list prices extend the possibility of collusion from small to large buyers (the multi-buyer contact effect). When suppliers compete, these announcements provide them with commitment to negotiate better terms with large buyers (the commitment effect).
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Bibliografía

Collusion is deemed unlikely in wholesale markets where upstream suppliers and intermediate buyers privately negotiate discounts off list prices and sales quotas are unfeasible. However, many wholesale markets include both small and large buyers who compete in the retail market. We study the role of publicly announced list prices in this wholesale-retail setting, whether suppliers collude or compete. When suppliers collude, public announcements of list prices extend the possibility of collusion from small to large buyers (the multi-buyer contact effect). When suppliers compete, these announcements provide them with commitment to negotiate better terms with large buyers (the commitment effect).

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Powered by Koha