Spending and pricing to deter arbitrage Stephen W. Salant
By: Salant, Stephen Walter
.
Material type: 





Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 282/2024/662-5 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 282/2024/662-5 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 282/2024/662-2 Political language in economics | OP 282/2024/662-3 Accommodating the rise in urbanisation | OP 282/2024/662-4 Kinship taxation as an impediment to growth | OP 282/2024/662-5 Spending and pricing to deter arbitrage | OP 282/2024/663 The Economic Journal | OP 282/2024/663-1 Price-cost margins, fixed costs and excess profits | OP 282/2024/663-2 Energy tax exemptions and industrial production |
Bibliografía
This article presents examples of arbitrage deterrence from the pharmaceutical, chemical and auto industries. Based on these cases, it develops two models where a monopolist prices and spends to deter arbitrage. The models differ in whether the lower price is set by the firm or negotiated with a representative of consumers. In both models, imports into the high-price market are completely deterred, but the two markets are nonetheless linked by the threat of arbitrage. If this linkage is ignored and the absence of arbitrage is misattributed to exogenous factors, econometric estimates of firm bargaining power will be biased upwards.
There are no comments for this item.