Should we breathe new life into the passthrough deduction? by Martin A. Sullivan
By: Sullivan, Martin
.
Material type: 




Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 138-Bis/2024/114/10-2 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 138-Bis/2024/114/10-2 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 138-Bis/2024/114/1 Tax Notes International | OP 138-Bis/2024/114/10 Tax Notes International | OP 138-Bis/2024/114/10-1 Spotlight on global minimum taxes shifts to individuals | OP 138-Bis/2024/114/10-2 Should we breathe new life into the passthrough deduction? | OP 138-Bis/2024/114/10-3 Unfair allocation of taxing rights on intangibles creates digital divide | OP 138-Bis/2024/114/10-4 ‘Good faith’ in tax treaties | OP 138-Bis/2024/114/1-1 The European Commission´s transfer pricing directive proposal and its implications for Luxembourg |
We aren’t so naïve to think that the low regard economists might have for a tax benefit enjoyed by 26 million owners of politically powerful “small” American businesses will do much to derail lawmakers’ efforts to extend most or all of it. Nevertheless, we thought it might be worthwhile to highlight some significant shortcomings of section 199A in the hope that Congress might consider modifications to the 20 percent deduction for qualified business income of passthroughs. It is scheduled to expire — along with all the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act’s individual tax cuts — at the end of 2025.
There are no comments for this item.