A tale of two subject-to-tax rules by Sol Picciotto, Jeffery M. Kadet and Bob Michel
By: Picciotto, Sol
.
Contributor(s): Kadet, Jeffery
| Michel, Bob
.
Material type: 



Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 138-B/2024/113/10-1 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 138-B/2024/113/10-1 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 138-B/2023/112/9-2 A critical analysis of the European Commission's BEFIT proposal | OP 138-B/2023/112/9-3 Anti-tax-evasion, EU directives, and greening | OP 138-B/2023/112/9-4 Generative AI | OP 138-B/2024/113/10-1 A tale of two subject-to-tax rules | OP 138-B/2024/113/10-2 HOT and VIDA | OP 138-B/2024/113/10-3 Italian carried interest tax qualification of multilevel investment schemes | OP 138-B/2024/113/10-4 Canadian Court changes course on beneficial ownership |
This article examines and contrasts two proposals for a subject-to-tax rule to be incorporated into tax treaties, one proposed by the U.N. Tax Committee and the other by the G20/OECD inclusive framework on base erosion and profit shifting.
There are no comments for this item.