Automated tax filing simulating a prepopulated form Lucas Goodman, Katherine Lim, Bruce Sacerdote and Andrew Whitten
Contributor(s): Goodman, Lucas W
.
Material type: 





Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 233/2023/4-2 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 233/2023/4-2 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 233/2023/3-5 How refundable tax credits can advance gender and racial equity | OP 233/2023/4 National Tax Journal | OP 233/2023/4-1 Territorial tax reform and profit shifting by US and Japanese multinationals | OP 233/2023/4-2 Automated tax filing | OP 233/2023/4-3 Agenda-setting and tax referenda | OP 233/2024/1 National Tax Journal | OP 233/2024/1-1 Products, services and tax-motivated income shifting |
Resumen.
Bibliografía.
Each year, Americans spend more than 1.7 billion hours and $33 billion preparing individual tax returns, and these filing costs are regressive. To lower and redistribute the filing burden, researchers and policy makers have proposed having the Internal Revenue Service prepopulate tax returns for individuals. We evaluate this hypothetical policy using a large, nationally representative sample of returns filed for tax year 2019. Our baseline results indicate that between 66 and 75 million returns (42–48 percent of all returns) could be accurately prepopulated using only current-year information returns and the prior-year return. Accuracy rates decline with income and are higher for taxpayers who have fewer dependents or are unmarried. We also examine 2019 nonfilers, finding that prepopulated returns tentatively indicate $8.2 billion in refunds due to 11 million (20 percent) of them.
There are no comments for this item.