Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Optimal wealth taxation when wealth is more than just capital Max Franks, Ottmar Edenhofer

By: Franks, Max.
Contributor(s): Edenhofer, Ottmar.
Material type: ArticleArticleSubject(s): RIQUEZA | PATRIMONIO | IMPUESTOS | DESIGUALDAD | BIENESTAR SOCIAL | IMPOSICION OPTIMA | MODELOS ECONOMETRICOS In: FinanzArchiv v. 79, n. 3, September 2023, p. 175-207Summary: We analyze the welfare implications of taxes on wealth, distinguishing between capital and land.We develop an overlapping generations model with heterogeneous agents and calibrate it to OECD data. We find that land rent taxes induce portfolio effects. Savings are shifted away from fixed land towards reproducible capital, enhancing GDP and reducing wealth inequality. Assuming a low pure rate of time preference, this can also raise social welfare, except under very low inequality aversion. By contrast, capital should be taxed only if inequality aversion is very high. We vary inequality aversion by considering three normative views: the Kaldor-Hicks criterion, prioritarian welfare functions and Rawlsian welfare functions.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Home library Call number Status Date due Barcode
Artículos IEF
IEF
OP 207/2023/3-1 (Browse shelf) Available OP 207/2023/3-1

Resumen.

Bibliografía.

We analyze the welfare implications of taxes on wealth, distinguishing between capital and land.We develop an overlapping generations model with heterogeneous agents and calibrate it to OECD data. We find that land rent taxes induce portfolio effects. Savings are shifted away from fixed land towards reproducible capital, enhancing GDP and reducing wealth inequality. Assuming a low pure rate of time preference, this can also raise social welfare, except under very low inequality aversion. By contrast, capital should be taxed only if inequality aversion is very high. We vary inequality aversion by considering three normative views: the Kaldor-Hicks criterion, prioritarian welfare functions and Rawlsian welfare functions.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Powered by Koha