Transfer pricing of financial guarantees the limits of arm's length and a practical solution Andrew Hickman, Marcelo Henrique Barbosa Moura
By: Hickman, Andrew
.
Contributor(s): Moura, Marcelo Henrique Barbosa
.
Material type: 






Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 2141/2023/1-2 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 2141/2023/1-2 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 2141/2023/11-4 EU public intervention in the energy market | OP 2141/2023/11-5 The solidarity contribution on excess profits of regulation 2022/1584 | OP 2141/2023/11-6 The implementation of the windfall profit tax for energy providers in Spain | OP 2141/2023/1-2 Transfer pricing of financial guarantees | OP 2141/2023/12 Intertax | OP 2141/2023/12-1 Would Pillar One fix the broken system? | OP 2141/2023/12-2 Pillar one and alchemy |
Resumen.
This article discusses how current approaches to pricing intra-group financial guarantees do not follow common practices and do not consistently apply the arm's length principle, which is used to determine the appropriate transfer price for transactions between related parties. These approaches also do not take into account recent updates of the OECD transfer pricing guidance related to risk control, and rely on complex and unsatisfactory valuation methods. The article suggests that revised guidance could potentially lead to different outcomes in cases like General Electric. Intra-group financial guarantees can be difficult to handle under the arm's length principle due to the capitalization of associated enterprises.
There are no comments for this item.