Partisanship and fiscal policy in economic unions evidence from US states by Gerald Carlino, Thorsten Drautzburg, Robert Inman and Nicholas Zarra
Contributor(s): Carlino, Gerald, A
.
Material type: 







Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 234/2023/3-1 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 234/2023/3-1 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 234/2023/2-1 Technological change and the consequences of job loss | OP 234/2023/2-2 The voice of monetary policy | OP 234/2023/3 The American Economic Review | OP 234/2023/3-1 Partisanship and fiscal policy in economic unions | OP 234/2023/4 The American Economic Review | OP 234/2023/4-1 Globalization and pandemics | OP 234/2023/5 The American Economic Review |
Resumen.
Bibliografía.
Partisanship of state governors affects the efficacy of US federal fiscal policy. Using close election data, we find partisan differences in the marginal propensity to spend federal intergovernmental transfers: Republican governors spend less than Democratic governors. Correspondingly, Republican-led states have lower debt, (delayed) lower taxes, and initially lower economic activity. A New Keynesian model of partisan states in a monetary union implies sizable aggregate effects: The intergovernmental transfer impact multiplier rises by 0.58 if Republican governors spend like Democratic governors, but due to delayed tax cuts, the long-run multiplier is higher with more Republican governors, generating an intertemporal policy trade-off.
There are no comments for this item.