Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Tax audits as scarecrows evidence from a large-scale field experiment by Marcelo Bergolo, Rodrigo Ceni Guillermo Cruces, Matias Giaccobasso and Ricardo Perez-Truglia

Contributor(s): Bérgolo, Marcelo.
Material type: ArticleArticleSubject(s): EMPRESAS PEQUEÑAS Y MEDIANAS | AUDITORIA FISCAL | EVASION FISCAL | ELUSION FISCAL In: American Economic Journal : Economic Policy v. 15, n. 1, February 2023, p. 110-153Summary: The canonical model of Allingham and Sandmo (1972) predicts that firms evade taxes by optimally trading off between the costs and benefits of evasion. However, there is no direct evidence that firms react to audits in this way. We conducted a large-scale field experiment in collaboration with a tax authority to address this question. We sent letters to 20,440 small- and medium-sized firms that collectively paid more than US$200 million in taxes per year. We find that providing information about audits significantly affected tax compliance but in a manner that was inconsistent with Allingham and Sandmo (1972).
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Resumen.

Bibliografía.

The canonical model of Allingham and Sandmo (1972) predicts that firms evade taxes by optimally trading off between the costs and benefits of evasion. However, there is no direct evidence that firms react to audits in this way. We conducted a large-scale field experiment in collaboration with a tax authority to address this question. We sent letters to 20,440 small- and medium-sized firms that collectively paid more than US$200 million in taxes per year. We find that providing information about audits significantly affected tax compliance but in a manner that was inconsistent with Allingham and Sandmo (1972).

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Powered by Koha