Tax audits as scarecrows evidence from a large-scale field experiment by Marcelo Bergolo, Rodrigo Ceni Guillermo Cruces, Matias Giaccobasso and Ricardo Perez-Truglia
Contributor(s): Bérgolo, Marcelo
.
Material type: 




Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 2135/2023/1-1 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 2135/2023/1-1 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 2135/2022/4-3 Multinationals' sales and profit shifting in tax havens | OP 2135/2022/4-4 Health care rationing in public insurance programs | OP 2135/2023/1 American Economic Journal : Economic Policy | OP 2135/2023/1-1 Tax audits as scarecrows | OP 2135/2023/1-2 Implications of tax loss asymmetry for owners of S corporations | OP 2135/2023/2 American Economic Journal : Economic Policy | OP 2135/2023/2-1 Optimal income taxation with spillovers from employer learning |
Resumen.
Bibliografía.
The canonical model of Allingham and Sandmo (1972) predicts that firms evade taxes by optimally trading off between the costs and benefits of evasion. However, there is no direct evidence that firms react to audits in this way. We conducted a large-scale field experiment in collaboration with a tax authority to address this question. We sent letters to 20,440 small- and medium-sized firms that collectively paid more than US$200 million in taxes per year. We find that providing information about audits significantly affected tax compliance but in a manner that was inconsistent with Allingham and Sandmo (1972).
There are no comments for this item.