Normal view MARC view ISBD view

After 80 years, has the IRS finally succeeded in narrowing Clark's recovery of capital doctrine? Alexa E. Shook

By: Shook, Alexa E.
Material type: ArticleArticleSubject(s): SOCIEDADES | COMPENSACION DE PERDIDAS | IMPUESTOS | ESTADOS UNIDOS | JURISPRUDENCIA In: Journal of Taxation of Investments v. 40, n. 2, Winter 2023, p. 23-43Summary: Clark v. Commissioner is a seminal Board of Tax Appeals case that supports the fundamental principle that for a transaction to be taxable, the taxpayer must have earned income on the transaction. Despite the case falling in line with what seems to be an obvious proposition, Clark has received scrutiny from a number of commentators, most notably, the Internal Revenue Service. The Service has, over the past 80 years, indicated that it disagrees with Clark and will only support its application in a situation analogous to the specific facts of that case. This article sets out to show that the Service’s hair-splitting analysis of the case is unwarranted in the broader context of requiring income for a transaction to be taxable.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Home library Call number Status Date due Barcode
Artículos IEF
IEF
OP 235/2023/40/2-3 (Browse shelf) Available OP 235/2023/40/2-3

Resumen.

Clark v. Commissioner is a seminal Board of Tax Appeals case that supports the fundamental principle that for a transaction to be taxable, the taxpayer must have earned income on the transaction. Despite the case falling in line with what seems to be an obvious proposition, Clark has received scrutiny from a number of commentators, most notably, the Internal Revenue Service. The Service has, over the past 80 years, indicated that it disagrees with Clark and will only support its application in a situation analogous to the specific facts of that case. This article sets out to show that the Service’s hair-splitting analysis of the case is unwarranted in the broader context of requiring income for a transaction to be taxable.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Powered by Koha