Another High Court Decision on the EU Arbitration Convention (90/436 electrónico Nikolaj Bjørnholm and Bodil Tolstrup
By: Bjornholm, Nikolaj
.
Contributor(s): Tolstrup, Bodil.
Material type: 
ArticleSubject(s): ARBITRAJE | CONTRIBUYENTES | ACUERDOS PREVIOS SOBRE PRECIOS DE TRANSFERENCIA | OPERACIONES VINCULADAS | PRECIOS DE TRANSFERENCIA | JURISPRUDENCIA | DINAMARCA
In:
International Transfer Pricing Journal v. 29, n. 5, p. 351-355Summary: The application of the Arbitration Convention (90/436) has resulted in another Danish High Court ruling. Recently, the Eastern High Court reached a somewhat different result than the Western High Court ruling from 2016, which probably was the first time a court within the European Union decided in a case on the Arbitration Convention (90/436). Again, the issue in the present case was whether or not the taxpayer’s MAP request had been rightly denied by the Danish tax authorities on the grounds that it failed to state certain particulars listed in point 5 of the Code of Conduct. Again, the Court sided with the taxpayer but applied a different interpretation of the Arbitration Convention. This note discusses the decision and its ramifications
| Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recursos electrónicos | IEF | IEF | ITPJ/2022/5-6 (Browse shelf) | Available | ITPJ/2022/5-6 |
Disponible únicamente en formato electrónico
Resumen
Incluye referencias bibliográficas
The application of the Arbitration Convention (90/436) has resulted in another Danish High Court ruling. Recently, the Eastern High Court reached a somewhat different result than the Western High Court ruling from 2016, which probably was the first time a court within the European Union decided in a case on the Arbitration Convention (90/436). Again, the issue in the present case was whether or not the taxpayer’s MAP request had been rightly denied by the Danish tax authorities on the grounds that it failed to state certain particulars listed in point 5 of the Code of Conduct. Again, the Court sided with the taxpayer but applied a different interpretation of the Arbitration Convention. This note discusses the decision and its ramifications
Click on an image to view it in the image viewer
There are no comments for this item.