Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Case C-368/21 a new definition of importation in the sense of VAT law? Sven Ojak

By: Ojak, Sven.
Material type: ArticleArticleSubject(s): IMPUESTO SOBRE EL VALOR AÑADIDO | IMPORTACION | INTERPRETACION | ALEMANIA | UNION EUROPEA In: EC Tax Review v. 31, n. 5, October 2022, p. 286-290Summary: Since the Eurogate II and DHL decision (judgment of 2 June 2016, Joined Cases C-226/14 and C-228/14), it has been clear that importation in the VAT context means ‘the entry of goods into the economic network’ of the Union. However, it is problematic that neither the EU VAT Directive nor the European Court of Justice (ECJ) provide a distinct definition of what is meant by this term. This article deals with the main existing theories on the interpretation of this indeterminate legal concept in the German-language literature and by the German fiscal courts. It is concluded that these theories unfortunately ignore the exposed consumption tax character of (import) VAT and therefore deliver inconsistent results in contradiction to the recent decisions of the ECJ.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Home library Call number Status Date due Barcode
Artículos IEF
IEF
OP 2141-B/2022/5-6 (Browse shelf) Available OP 2141-B/2022/5-6

Resumen.

Since the Eurogate II and DHL decision (judgment of 2 June 2016, Joined Cases C-226/14 and C-228/14), it has been clear that importation in the VAT context means ‘the entry of goods into the economic network’ of the Union. However, it is problematic that neither the EU VAT Directive nor the European Court of Justice (ECJ) provide a distinct definition of what is meant by this term. This article deals with the main existing theories on the interpretation of this indeterminate legal concept in the German-language literature and by the German fiscal courts. It is concluded that these theories unfortunately ignore the exposed consumption tax character of (import) VAT and therefore deliver inconsistent results in contradiction to the recent decisions of the ECJ.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Powered by Koha