Fictitious interest and dividends under tax treaties and the EU Directives Savvas Kostikidis & Florian Striefler
By: Kostikidis, Savvas
.
Contributor(s): Striefler, Florian.
Material type: 
ArticleSubject(s): EMPRESAS MULTINACIONALES | SUCURSALES | DIVIDENDOS | INTERES | IMPUESTO DE SOCIEDADES | LEGISLACION COMUNITARIA | UNION EUROPEA
In:
EC Tax Review v. 31, n. 5, October 2022, p. 251-259Summary: On 24 February 2022 the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled in the case Viva Telecom Bulgaria EOOD v. Direktor na Direktsia Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika – Sofia (Case C-257/20), inter alia, that fictitious interest payments do not enjoy withholding tax exemption neither under the Interest and Royalties Directive (2003/49) nor under the Parent-Subsidiary Directive (2011/96). This article questions this finding and argues that fictitious interest and dividends should fall under the Interest and Royalties Directive and Parent-Subsidiary Directive respectively.
| Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 2141-B/2022/5-3 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 2141-B/2022/5-3 |
Resumen.
On 24 February 2022 the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled in the case Viva Telecom Bulgaria EOOD v. Direktor na Direktsia Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika – Sofia (Case C-257/20), inter alia, that fictitious interest payments do not enjoy withholding tax exemption neither under the Interest and Royalties Directive (2003/49) nor under the Parent-Subsidiary Directive (2011/96). This article questions this finding and argues that fictitious interest and dividends should fall under the Interest and Royalties Directive and Parent-Subsidiary Directive respectively.
Click on an image to view it in the image viewer
There are no comments for this item.