Addressing base erosion and profit shifting the implementation of the ATAD in Germany Daniel Fehling
By: Fehling, Daniel
.
Material type: 






Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 2141/2022/10-5 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 2141/2022/10-5 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 2141/2022/10-2 Designing domestic minimum taxes in response to the Global Minimum Tax | OP 2141/2022/10-3 Revenue effects of the Global Minimum Tax under Pillar two | OP 2141/2022/10-4 Pillar two and African countries | OP 2141/2022/10-5 Addressing base erosion and profit shifting | OP 2141/2022/10-6 Right to a reasonable time during tax audits in Turkey | OP 2141/2022/10-7 Thirty years of fiscal (in)coherence | OP 2141/2022/1-1 Agreement?, what agreement? |
Resumen.
Germany has been an active supporter of the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) Project from its initiation and has also supported the implementation of core BEPS recommendations in Europe through the anti-tax avoidance directive (ATAD). However, the subsequent domestic implementation process took longer than expected. It was only in June 2021 that the last remaining pieces of the ATAD were transposed into German tax law. This article explains Germany’s perspective on the ATAD more generally and describes which parts of domestic tax law have been amended in order to ensure conformity with the directive.
There are no comments for this item.