Dutch fertilizer transfer pricing litigation which entity is the tested party? by J. Harold McClure
By: MacClure, J. Harold
.
Material type: 




Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 138-Bis/2022/107/4-3 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 138-Bis/2022/107/4-3 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 138-Bis/2022/107/4 Tax Notes International | OP 138-Bis/2022/107/4-1 Global minimum taxes | OP 138-Bis/2022/107/4-2 Application of the MFN clause under India's tax treaties | OP 138-Bis/2022/107/4-3 Dutch fertilizer transfer pricing litigation | OP 138-Bis/2022/107/4-4 After 40 years, the Caribbean basin initiative needs a boost | OP 138-Bis/2022/107/4-5 "'Catch-56" | OP 138-Bis/2022/107/5 Tax Notes International |
Resumen.
Incluye referencias bibliográficas.
In this article, the author considers a Dutch court’s recent transfer pricing decision regarding a fertilizer multinational’s Dutch producer and its Swiss distribution affiliate. He also discusses a similar Russian case and uses yet another fertilizer company’s financials to further explore the Dutch litigation.
There are no comments for this item.