Can there ever be a fixed establishment without human resources? electrónico ECJ’s Titanium Case Gorka Echevarría Zubeldia
By: Echevarría Zubeldia, Gorka
.
Material type: 






Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recursos electrónicos | IEF | IEF | IVM/2022/2-3 (Browse shelf) | Available | IVM/2022/2-3 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
IVM/2022/2 International VAT Monitor | IVM/2022/2-1 The DuoDecad Case | IVM/2022/2-2 What does the EU VAT actually tax? | IVM/2022/2-3 Can there ever be a fixed establishment without human resources? | IVM/2022/2-4 Overview of general turnover taxes and tax rates | IVM/2022/2-5 Deduction of import VAT | IVM/2022/2-6 A great reset of VAT rates? |
Disponible únicamente en formato electrónico.
Resumen.
Incluye referencias bibliográficas.
In the Titanium decision of 3 June 2021, the ECJ considers that there is no fixed establishment for VAT purposes when a foreign company leases real estate in an EU Member State, regardless of subcontracting the operational management of the business to a third party, as such outsourcing does not fulfil the requirement of having human resources in that jurisdiction. In this article, the author discusses this ECJ case.
There are no comments for this item.