Normal view MARC view ISBD view

The importance of being capitalized electrónico the right debt-to-equity level for intercompany financing in Luxembourg Pawel Wroblewski and Marc Rasch

By: Wroblewski, Pawel.
Contributor(s): Rasch, Marc.
Material type: ArticleArticleSubject(s): PRECIOS DE TRANSFERENCIA | GRUPOS DE EMPRESAS | FINANCIACION | OPERACIONES FINANCIERAS | OPERACIONES SOCIETARIAS | AMPLIACION DE CAPITAL | LUXEMBURGO In: International Transfer Pricing Journal v. 29, n. 1, 2022, p. 67-71Summary: The recent update of the OECD Guidelines provides long-awaited guidance as to how to apply the arm’s length principle in relation to financial transactions. An important element of this guidance covers the debt-and-equity balance from a transfer pricing perspective. From a Luxembourg point of view, absent any official regulations covering thin capitalization and in line with the OECD Guidelines, it is expected that the market practice of 85:15 will no longer be applicable, unless it can be supported by a proper transfer pricing analysis. Non-supported debt-to-equity ratios may lead to a shift in the burden of proof.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Resumen.

The recent update of the OECD Guidelines provides long-awaited guidance as to how to apply the arm’s length principle in relation to financial transactions. An important element of this guidance covers the debt-and-equity balance from a transfer pricing perspective. From a Luxembourg point of view, absent any official regulations covering thin capitalization and in line with the OECD Guidelines, it is expected that the market practice of 85:15 will no longer be applicable, unless it can be supported by a proper transfer pricing analysis. Non-supported debt-to-equity ratios may lead to a shift in the burden of proof.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Powered by Koha