Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Order in Skelleftea Industrihus AB a reversal of the INZO, Ghent Coal Terminal and Breitsohl jurisprudence? Marie Lamensch

By: Lamensch, Marie.
Material type: ArticleArticleSubject(s): IMPUESTO SOBRE EL VALOR AÑADIDO | DEDUCCIONES | NEUTRALIDAD | TRIBUNAL DE JUSTICIA DE LAS COMUNIDADES EUROPEAS | UNION EUROPEA | JURISPRUDENCIA In: EC Tax Review v. 31, n. 3, June 2022, p. 159-162Summary: This article discusses the Order issued by the European Court of Justice on 18 May 2021 in Case C-248/20 (Skatteverket v Skellefteå Industrihus AB). According to the author it is either based on a wrong interpretation of the Court’s case law in the ITH and Stichting Schoonzicht cases, or constitutes nothing less than a reversal of the ECJ landmark INZO and Breitsohl decisions.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Resumen.

This article discusses the Order issued by the European Court of Justice on 18 May 2021 in Case C-248/20 (Skatteverket v Skellefteå Industrihus AB). According to the author it is either based on a wrong interpretation of the Court’s case law in the ITH and Stichting Schoonzicht cases, or constitutes nothing less than a reversal of the ECJ landmark INZO and Breitsohl decisions.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Powered by Koha