The implementation of the ATAD by Austria Stefanie Geringer
By: Geringer, Stefanie
.
Material type: 






Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 2141/2022/4-5 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 2141/2022/4-5 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 2141/2022/4-1 Pillar Two model rules | OP 2141/2022/4-2 Tax policies in a transition to a knowledge-based economy | OP 2141/2022/4-4 Access to tax treaty dispute resolution mechanisms in cases of abuse | OP 2141/2022/4-5 The implementation of the ATAD by Austria | OP 2141/2022/4-6 Honduran Zones for Employment and Economic Development (ZEDEs) in light of BEPS Action 5 | OP 2141/2022/5 Intertax | OP 2141/2022/5-1 The Pillar Two top-up taxes |
Resumen.
The Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (ATAD) and ATAD II had major implications for the Austrian corporate tax regime. Particularly, Austria was obligated to introduce an interest limitation rule, a controlled foreign company (CFC) rule, and comprehensive hybrid mismatches rules. This article provides an overview of the transposition measures, and shows the deviations from the ATAD’s standards in Austria.
There are no comments for this item.