Increasing hours worked moonlighting responses to a large tax reform by Alisa Tazhitdinova
By: Tazhitdinova, Alisa
.
Material type: 



Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 2135/2022/1-4 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 2135/2022/1-4 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 2135/2022/1-1 Yellow vests, pessimistic beliefs, and carbon tax aversion | OP 2135/2022/1-2 How do households value the future? | OP 2135/2022/1-3 Technology, taxation, and corruption | OP 2135/2022/1-4 Increasing hours worked | OP 2135/2022/1-5 Removing welfare traps | OP 2135/2022/2 American Economic Journal : Economic Policy | OP 2135/2022/2-1 The electric Gini |
Resumen.
Bibliografía.
Moonlighting is increasingly popular in OECD countries, with 5 to 10 percent of workers holding two or more jobs. However, little is known about the responsiveness of moonlighting to financial incentives due to the lack of identifying variation. This paper studies a unique reform in Germany that allowed workers to hold small secondary jobs tax-free, decreasing the marginal tax rate by between 19.5 to 66 pp. I show that the reform resulted in a dramatic increase in moonlighting that was not offset by reductions in primary earnings and that hours constraints are a key determinant of moonlighting.
There are no comments for this item.