Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Cyclical Government spending theory and empirics Jordan Roulleau-Pasdeloup

By: Roulleau Pasdeloup, Jordan.
Material type: ArticleArticlePublisher: 2021Subject(s): GASTO PUBLICO | CICLOS ECONOMICOS | EFECTO MULTIPLICADOR In: The Economic Journal v. 131, n. 640, November 2021, p. 3392–3416Summary: This paper shows that part of what is usually labelled discretionary government spending actually varies systematically over the cycle. I exploit the pervasive gap between ordinary least squares and two-stage least squares local government spending multipliers to estimate how cyclical the systematic part of government spending is. Estimating a structural open-economy New Keynesian model on United States state-level data, I find that when employment decreases by 1%, the systematic component of government spending decreases by 0.23%. I also find that the empirical specification in Nakamura and Steinsson, ‘Fiscal Stimulus in a monetary union’ (American Economic Review, 2014) does a good job in recovering the true impact multiplier effect, but that it overestimates the long-run cumulative effect.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Home library Call number Status Date due Barcode
Artículos IEF
IEF
OP 282/2021/640-2 (Browse shelf) Available OP 282/2021/640-2

Resumen.

Bibliografía.

This paper shows that part of what is usually labelled discretionary government spending actually varies systematically over the cycle. I exploit the pervasive gap between ordinary least squares and two-stage least squares local government spending multipliers to estimate how cyclical the systematic part of government spending is. Estimating a structural open-economy New Keynesian model on United States state-level data, I find that when employment decreases by 1%, the systematic component of government spending decreases by 0.23%. I also find that the empirical specification in Nakamura and Steinsson, ‘Fiscal Stimulus in a monetary union’ (American Economic Review, 2014) does a good job in recovering the true impact multiplier effect, but that it overestimates the long-run cumulative effect.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Powered by Koha