Tax administration versus tax rates evidence from corporate taxation in Indonesia M. Chatib Basri, Mayara Felix, Rema Hanna, Benjamin A. Olken
Contributor(s): Basri, M. Chatib
.
Material type: 





Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 234/2021/12-1 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 234/2021/12-1 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 234/2021/10 The American Economic Review | OP 234/2021/1-1 Politically feasible reforms of nonlinear tax systems | OP 234/2021/12 The American Economic Review | OP 234/2021/12-1 Tax administration versus tax rates | OP 234/2021/2 The American Economic Review | OP 234/2021/2-1 Intertemporal labor supply substitution ? | OP 234/2021/3 The American Economic Review |
Resumen.
Bibliografía.
We compare two approaches to increasing tax revenue: tax administration and tax rates. We show that when Indonesia moved top regional firms into "medium taxpayer offices," with high staff-to-taxpayer ratios, tax revenue more than doubled. Examining nonlinear changes to corporate income tax rates, we estimate an elasticity of taxable income of 0.579. Combining these estimates, improved tax administration is equivalent to raising top rates on all firms by 8 percentage points. On net, improved tax administration can have significant returns for developing countries.
There are no comments for this item.