Normal view MARC view ISBD view

German Federal Constitutional Court strengthens role of ECJ as lawful judge in German cross-border tax matters electrónico Michael Puls and Nadia C. Altenburg

By: Puls, Michael.
Contributor(s): Altenburg, Nadia C.
Material type: ArticleArticlePublisher: 2021Subject(s): PRECIOS DE TRANSFERENCIA | OPERACIONES TRANSFRONTERIZAS | ALEMANIA | TRIBUNAL DE JUSTICIA DE LAS COMUNIDADES EUROPEAS | UNION EUROPEA | JURISPRUDENCIA In: International Transfer Pricing Journal v. 28, n. 5, 2021Summary: The German Federal Court passed a verdict (IR 73/16) emphasizing the importance of ECJ case law for cases regarding cross-border transfer pricing issues. The decision regards a cross-border loan that was allegedly not at arm’s length due to the lack of sufficient collateral provided. The German Federal Court ruled that, in order to prevent eroding the ECJ’s importance, ECJ case law must be considered by national courts and that the ECJ must be consulted in situations where clear guidance or interpretation from the ECJ under the acte clair and acte éclairé doctrines is not available.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Disponible únicamente en formato electrónico.

Resumen.

The German Federal Court passed a verdict (IR 73/16) emphasizing the importance of ECJ case law for cases regarding cross-border transfer pricing issues. The decision regards a cross-border loan that was allegedly not at arm’s length due to the lack of sufficient collateral provided. The German Federal Court ruled that, in order to prevent eroding the ECJ’s importance, ECJ case law must be considered by national courts and that the ECJ must be consulted in situations where clear guidance or interpretation from the ECJ under the acte clair and acte éclairé doctrines is not available.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Powered by Koha