Normal view MARC view ISBD view

When can taxpayers invoke the substance-over-form doctrine? Erik M. Jensen

By: Jensen, Erik M.
Material type: ArticleArticlePublisher: 2021Subject(s): CONTRIBUYENTES | DERECHOS | IMPUESTOS | ESTADOS UNIDOSOnline resources: Click here to access online In: Journal of Taxation of Investments v. 38, n. 3, Spring 2021, p. 75-86Summary: This article considers the circumstances under which taxpayers can disavow the form of a transaction they enter in order to claim better tax consequences based on the substance of the transaction. In some situations, the disavowal is noncontroversial because the Internal Revenue Service has blessed the transactions. In a few situations where the Service resists, however, taxpayers are sometimes successful anyway. The focus of the article is on the Tax Court’s 2021 decision in Complex Media, Inc. v. Commissioner, and substantial discussion is devoted to the Third Circuit’s wellknown, and sometimes controversial, 1967 decision in Commissioner v. Danielson.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Disponible también en formato electrónico.

Resumen.

This article considers the circumstances under which taxpayers can disavow the form of a transaction they enter in order to claim better tax consequences based on the substance of the transaction. In some situations, the disavowal is noncontroversial because the Internal Revenue Service has blessed the transactions. In a few situations where the Service resists, however, taxpayers are sometimes successful anyway. The focus of the article is on the Tax Court’s 2021 decision in Complex Media, Inc. v. Commissioner, and substantial discussion is devoted to the Third Circuit’s wellknown, and sometimes controversial, 1967 decision in Commissioner v. Danielson.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Powered by Koha