The development of the doctrine of abuse of law and the Danish cases time to shift the focus from non-genuine arrangements to single (abusive) transactions? Andrea Ballancin & Francesco Cannas
By: Ballancin, Andrea
.
Contributor(s): Cannas, Francesco.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: 2021Subject(s): DERECHO TRIBUTARIO | ABUSO DEL DERECHO | ATAD | DINAMARCA | UNION EUROPEA
In:
EC Tax Review v. 30, n. 2, Abril 2021, p. 70-80Summary: The article first retraces the history of the standards adopted under the EU abuse of law doctrine to identify abusive conduct executed by the taxpayer. Then, the authors progress from the differences between the rules contained in the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (ATAD) and the findings of the European Court of Justice in the Danish Cases, which constitute the last steps of that history, and elaborate on some proposals in order to update the former in light of the judges' findings. They propose shifting the focus from non-genuine arrangements to single (potentially abusive) transactions, also taking into consideration the criteria relied upon in transfer pricing and controlled foreign company (CFC) legislation to ascertain whether economic substance is present.
| Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 2141-B/2021/2-4 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 2141-B/2021/2-4 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| OP 2141-B/2021/2-1 The future of digital services taxes | OP 2141-B/2021/2-2 Between apples and oranges | OP 2141-B/2021/2-3 A new (circular) economy | OP 2141-B/2021/2-4 The development of the doctrine of abuse of law and the Danish cases | OP 2141-B/2021/3 EC Tax Review | OP 2141-B/2021/3-1 Towards mandatory e-invoicing for VAT and a common clearance system | OP 2141-B/2021/3-2 Are the OECD/G20 pillar two GloBE-rules compliant with the fundamental freedoms? |
Disponible también en formato electrónico.
Resumen
The article first retraces the history of the standards adopted under the EU abuse of law doctrine to identify abusive conduct executed by the taxpayer. Then, the authors progress from the differences between the rules contained in the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (ATAD) and the findings of the European Court of Justice in the Danish Cases, which constitute the last steps of that history, and elaborate on some proposals in order to update the former in light of the judges' findings. They propose shifting the focus from non-genuine arrangements to single (potentially abusive) transactions, also taking into consideration the criteria relied upon in transfer pricing and controlled foreign company (CFC) legislation to ascertain whether economic substance is present.
Click on an image to view it in the image viewer
There are no comments for this item.