Taxing the digital economy a case study on the Unified Approach Stefan Greil & Thomas Eisgruber
By: Greil, Stefan
.
Contributor(s): Eisgruber, Thomas
.
Material type: 





Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 2141/2021/1-6 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 2141/2021/1-6 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 2141/2021/1-3 The market distortion provisions of Articles 116-117 TFEU | OP 2141/2021/1-4 Skandia America and VAT grouping in Spain | OP 2141/2021/1-5 Compliance of automatic tax fraud detection systems with the right to privacy standards based on the Polish experience of the STIR system | OP 2141/2021/1-6 Taxing the digital economy | OP 2141/2021/1-7 Taxation of workers in the gig economy | OP 2141/2021/1-8 Combating tax avoidance in Russia | OP 2141/2021/2 Intertax |
Resumen.
In October 2020, the OECD Secretariat published the ‘Report on Pillar One Blueprint’ approved by the Inclusive Framework on BEPS as a result of the work on the tax challenges arising from digitization. This contribution attempts to explain the application of the Unified Approach, especially Amount A using a case study. The case study reveals a considerable complexity of the proposed new system. Therefore a simplification potential is to be pointed out at the same time, in order to make Amount A practicable. The possibility is not precluded that certain aspects could be interpreted or regarded differently. Therefore, this case study intends to contribute to the development of a common understanding, too. It is important that all participants in a multilateral system have a common understanding. Otherwise, this results in double taxation and enormous administrative challenges for taxpayers and tax administrations. There is still the opportunity to make changes. This should be used now, since multilateral systems are difficult to change once they have been implemented. Finally, the application of the proposed draft of the new Article 12B of the UN Tax Treaty Model is also considered.
There are no comments for this item.